[   about   /   blog   /   course notes   /   publications   /   contact     newsletters   ]
Engineering Economics: Financial Management for Engineers, taken in Spring 2019.
Brian P. Cozzarin
Lock the reference with $Col$Row, or F4
.
the second dimension of money: opportunity cost of capital/money in the space of time.
i.e. what you could’ve done with the money in that space of time.
i.e. gain in interest, gains from choosing different stocks…
How to compare different opportunities? Calculate the NPV and IRR of investments. Finance under certainty.
Future value: \(principal \times (1 + rate)^{N}\)
where \(N\) is the number of periods. At higher interest rates, the curve is steeper.
In Excel: FV(rate, number of periods, equal payment per term [optional], -present value)
note that present value is negative.
Present value: if you are promised money in the future, how much is it worth today? Taking compound interest of time frame into account
Note that present value and future value are mirror images.
Present value: \(principal \div (1 + rate)^{N}\)
As interest rate increases, present value decreases. i.e. present value at 6% is higher than present value with 35%. See formula.
On Excel, PV computes present value or series of constant payment (annuity stream, ex lottery payouts), all payments are equal. Make negative so that the PV function produces a positive answer.
On Excel, NPV computes the present value, not the net present value.
This present value is for unequal payments over time, use PV for constant or equal payments over time.
Payments on flat loan payments. Repays a constant amount over the term, resulting into the total of the loan.
\[PV = \frac{X}{(1 + r)^{1}} + \frac{X}{(1 + r)^{2}} + \frac{X}{(1 + r)^{3}} + ... + \frac{X}{(1 + r)^{N}}\]Use Excel’s PMT to compute loan payments. Parameters needed: rate \(r\), number of periods \(N\), principal value or loan total \(PV\)
Note that \(PV\) is a negative number so that the PMT returns a positive payment.
i.e Saving for an amount 3 methods:
Goal Seek computes X.
NPV and IRR sometimes give conflicting conclusions. When there is a conflict, use NPV. NPV criteria maximizes wealth. IRR maximizes rate of return.
Crossover point where the NPV disagrees with the IRR:
But NPV is always preferred.
Caveat using the NPV as criterion: they need to have the same lifespan.
Net present value: NPV of a series of future cash flows is the present value of the cash flow, minus the initial investment required
\[NPV = -InitialInvestment + \frac{X}{(1 + r)^{1}} + \frac{X}{(1 + r)^{2}} + \frac{X}{(1 + r)^{3}} + ... + \frac{X}{(1 + r)^{N}}\]In other words: whether or not it’s worth spending the initial investment, depending of whether the net present value taking time into account is positive.
Investment is worthwhile if: \(NPV>0\)
Internal rate of return, to evaluate new projects (i.e. getting a new computer? starting a new training program?) Represents the discount rate that we obtain if the investment’s NPV is 0. Equivalent to percentage gain.
Excel’s IRR: plotting NPV and seeing when the curve crosses the x-axis (x-intercept) is the IRR percentage.
IRR(values per year)
IRR can be over the discount rate, but the NPV can be negative.
Modified IRR:
Equivalent annual cash flows
Profitability index
IRR is where the NPV crosses the x-axis.
i.e. should you build a bridge with a toll?? yes or no, just make an IRR analysis
capital budgeting: deciding whether or not to undertake an investment project
risk is standard deviation
portfolio diversification is spreading savings between many assets to smooth out the risk of the portfolio
VFINX: stock symbol of Vanguard’s Index 500 fund. Pries include the dividends paid by the Standard & Poor’s 500 index, hence is the best choice for data on the true returns of the SP 500.
alpha = INTERCEPT(SP500 return, stock return)
beta = SLOPE(SP500 return, stock return)
r-squared = RSQ(SP500 return, stock return)
graph, use equation estimate to get alpha, beta, rsquared
diversification of uncorrelated assets improve your investment returns (average return is the same, but risk/standard dev is lowered)
when asset returns are perfectly positively correlated, diversification does not lower risk
when assets are perfectly negatively correlated, diversification can eliminate all risk
capital asset pricing model (CAPM) and the security market line (SML)
\(r_f\) is the risk-free asset’s return (i.e. guaranteed interest)
\(E(r_M)\) is the expected return on the market
the capital market line (CML) indicates how an investor should optimally split investments between risky and non-risky assets
\[E(r_p) = (1 - w_m) \times r_f + w_m \times E(r_M)\]equivalent to:
\[E(r_p) = r_f + w_m \times \left[ E(r_M) - r_f \right]\]the security market line (SML) states how the expected return of an asset is related to its risk, and how risk should be measured
general principles of security valuation
CAGR compound annual growth rate
Chapter 16:
as \(n \rightarrow \infty\)
equivalent to: \(PV = \frac{a}{r+d}\) when |g| < |r|
current market price is the correct valuation (efficient market hypothesis?)
i.e. @ ABC holding company:
percentage of shares owned of X company \(\times\) market value = market value of ABC holdings in X company
Don’t worry about WACC from the textbook.
Equity cash flow is dividends.
More reliable in the industry
Price-to-Earning